Winchester, Harrington & Richardson Arms and the U. LRB Arms checks every receiver for surface hardness and does periodic destructive testing for core hardness and case depth. government reports and independent lab test results I've read and several discussions with two M14 manufacturers and a number of experienced M14 gunsmiths, I would pick a LRB Arms receiver over a USGI receiver any day when it comes to heat treatment. I am very well considering an LRB or SEI, but until then my M1A is running great.īased on U. But for the average shooter, 99% of M1A's run great and shoot very accurately to boot.
But I'd have more faith in a LRB (or M1A for that matter) with all USGI parts to run better than the current production M1A's with foreign made parts. No offense intended with the "trust my life" comment. I'm sure 99% of M1A's would run like a top of pushed hard, but the Korean and other non-USGI parts really turn me off. Some people act like an M1A is a Wal-mart Savage. Does that make all LRB's untrustworthy?Īnd USGI parts were made by civilian contract labor just like anything else. I've seen some reports of bad LRB receivers.
If I had to defend my home, I know it would work like everything else I have. In extended combat? I don't have to deal with that. I'd trust my life to it, just like an off the shelf Glock or HK. I'd only trust my life to my LRB/USGI though. I'd drop $1400 on a SA Standard to use as a range beater. Well, then I want a new one with a chrome-lined barrel.
0 kommentar(er)
